Biological Theories of Crime

You will find four different theories of your crime. İncluded in this are psychological theories, social-biological theories, sociological theories, and biological theories of crime. Many early positivists absolutely considered that genetic abnormalities were the reason for criminal behavior.

Lombroso, an early on positivist, stated that criminals represented a youthful, savage form of humankind with is advanced notion of atavism.

Hoorten, an early on positivist in 1939, claimed which he discovered important and major biological variations in noncriminals and criminals. In his biological theories of crime he stated that burglars and robbers had different biological and physical traits. He was quoted saying that burglars, usually the less violent of these two, usually possessed blond hair, short heads, and nonprotruding jaws. He stated that robbers, the more violent of these two, possessed short ears, long wavy hair, and broad faces.

Sheldon, and early positivist in 1949, created Somatic Typology. This technique contained three major physique, also called somatatypes, including mesomorphs, endomorphs, and ectomorphs. In his biological theories of crime he stated a mesomorph was athletic and muscular in physique, and their personality was vigorous, assertive, and bold. He stated that endomorphs were soft, obese, and rounded people in physical stature, and their personality was sociable and fun-loving. He stated that ectomorphs were thin and tall in physical stature, were built with a well-developed brain, and their personality type was sensitive, introverted, and nervous. In his biological theories of crime, he thought that mesomorphs, in comparison with ectomorphs and endomorphs, were probably the most likely somatic type being criminals. Though many believe Sheldon’s theories were ridiculous, recent biological theories of crime researchers have replicated this believed link between criminal behavior and the entire body type.

Olweus, a positivist in 1995, closely examined the various factors that always lead elementary school boys to becoming bullies. He studied this included in his biological theories of crime due to the link between boys which can be considered bullies and crime. It is really a proven fact that bullies are 4x more prone to be repeatedly arrested as adults, in comparison with boys that are not bullies. Based on his biological theories of crime, the prototypical bully features a hotheaded temperament and is also physically stronger. The household life commonalities include insufficient family warmth, discipline as physical punishment, when aggressive behavior is incorporated in the home, the household commonality included permissiveness.

The task and research conducted over several years by biological theorists of crime has lead many within the criminology field to reconsider and think about the potential influence that biological factors have in assisting to comprehend the probable and possible factors behind antisocial behavior. Impressive empirical support has become being directed at modern biological theories of crime, particularly for specific factors that attempt to integrate psychological concepts, biological concepts, and social concepts in to the general crime theories. It has become becoming widely accepted that one biological factors have immense benefits to provide criminology theory today. However, most supporters believe that to think about the role of biological theories of crime like a major criminology component, they need to be looked at mediated by, or in addition to individual sociocultural contextual factors and individual activities.